TSTP Solution File: NUM020^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : NUM020^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 08:07:16 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.34s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  18 unt;  15 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (  17 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   79 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  73   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :  128 ( 128   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   17 (  15 usr;   1 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (  40   ^   4   !;   3   ?;  48   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    zero: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    one: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    two: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    three: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    four: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    five: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    six: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    seven: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    eight: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    nine: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    ten: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    succ: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    plus: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    mult: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    ph1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f54,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f53]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i,Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i] :
            ( X0
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,Y1: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,Y2: $i > $i,Y3: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y1 @ Y2 ) @ Y3 )
        @ X0
        @ ^ [Y0: $i > $i,Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i,Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f43,f37,f47,f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( three
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i,Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( three
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i,Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $i,X1: $i] : ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) )
    = three ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4C3S69ImPD/Vampire---4.8_26631',three_ax) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( mult
    = ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,Y1: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,Y2: $i > $i,Y3: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y1 @ Y2 ) @ Y3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( mult
    = ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,Y1: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,Y2: $i > $i,Y3: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y1 @ Y2 ) @ Y3 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( mult
    = ( ^ [X0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X2: $i > $i,X3: $i] : ( X0 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,axiom,
    ( mult
    = ( ^ [X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X0: $i > $i,X1: $i] : ( X3 @ ( X2 @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4C3S69ImPD/Vampire---4.8_26631',mult_ax) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( six
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i,Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( six
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i,Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $i,X1: $i] : ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
    = six ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4C3S69ImPD/Vampire---4.8_26631',six_ax) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( six
     != ( mult @ X0 @ three ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( six
     != ( mult @ X0 @ three ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
        ( six
        = ( mult @ X0 @ three ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
        ( six
        = ( mult @ X2 @ three ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,conjecture,
    ? [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( six
      = ( mult @ X2 @ three ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4C3S69ImPD/Vampire---4.8_26631',thm) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : NUM020^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 14:34:31 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.32  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.11/0.32  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4C3S69ImPD/Vampire---4.8_26631
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26739)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26742)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26743)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26745)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26746)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26744)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26741)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26740)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (26739)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.34  % (26745)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.16/0.34  % (26739)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.16/0.34  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.34  % (26739)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.34  % (26739)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.34  % (26739)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.34  
% 0.16/0.34  % (26739)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.34  % (26739)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.34  % (26739)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.34  % (26739)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.34  % (26739)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.34  % (26738)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.34  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------